Defining the Narrative

Acquired Immunity

Reporting on the “new Delta Variant” has been at a near fever pitch as Americans attitude toward receiving the mRNA vaccines has waned and interest in participating in the “great experiment” has plateaued and dropped drastically. The new variant has been determined to be “more contagious” than the last 2 or 3 Cv19 SARS 2 Corona (or whatever other labels they hang on the Wuhan experimental virus), but the reporting never goes past “more contagious”.

Natural Immunity, by means of natural exposure is still, after a year, omitted from discussion and statistics reported in legacy media reports about Covid 19.

The true journalist should be asking questions like “what is the hospitalization rate” and “death rate compared to the original virus”. In all fairness, I did hear one ABC radio news-break that said the “hospitalizations are at highest rate since March” in southwest Missouri. That number, according to ABC, on June 23, 19 patients.

I have contended for over a year now, that “acquired immunity” or “herd immunity” will basically make a vaccine irrelevant. I may, or may not, have missed the timeline, but the question remains; “Is the reduction of new cases a result of mass vaccination, or in spite of it”. Would we be in the same approximate point on the waning curve of the “pandemic” if we were still waiting for a tested and proven vaccine to be approved by the FDA? Indeed, that question will remain.

Herd Immunity

Any discussion of “herd immunity” must include the scientific fact, or truth, of naturally acquired immunity. You simply cannot have millions of cases and not have acquired immunity by exposure in the population. (See the excerpts below)

The “authorities” have consistently pretended that the only factor in acquiring “herd immunity” is mass vaccination. “Acquired Immunity” (by natural exposure) has never been part of the discussion included in legacy media reporting or commentary, or by government authorities, in spite of multiple studies being done, more ongoing, and published. I have included excerpts of a “Science Daily” report below, (as well as the link) from one of several that are very easily found by anyone interested, and professional journalists can find them as well as I.

Therefore, the glaring question is “why?”. Why are journalists not asking these questions? Why are media “news

services” and social media squashing or limiting legitimate information such as these studies. This is the kind of information censorship that creates “conspiracy theories” about the vaccines. If people have already developed the antibodies, and the antibody producing “T” cells, they don’t need a vaccine, and an untested, and still classified by the FDA as “experimental”, vaccine which will probably not be as effective, or as broad spectrum, as naturally acquired immunity. (Keep in mind that “big pharma” has been given the most effective man made immunity by the government against liability for damages or injury from their products.)

Just within the last few days, FDA has come out with warnings of risk of enlarged heart in younger people taking the vaccines. I have not even gotten into other detrimental medical results, or what I believe are the greatest risks or possible motives for the ongoing deception.

Omission of key facts is as much a lie as a deliberate false statement.

Politicized “science” is not science.

Propaganda is not Journalism.

——From Science Daily, May 24,2021

Source: Washington University School of Medicine

Mild COVID-19 induces lasting antibody protection, study finds

People who have had mild illness develop antibody-producing cells that can last lifetime.

“Months after recovering from mild cases of COVID-19, people still have immune cells in their body pumping out antibodies against the virus that causes COVID-19, according to a study from researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis. Such cells could persist for a lifetime, churning out antibodies all the while.

The findings, published May 24 in the journal Nature, suggest that mild cases of COVID-19 leave those infected with lasting antibody protection and that repeated bouts of illness are likely to be uncommon.”

“People with mild cases of COVID-19 clear the virus from their bodies two to three weeks after infection, so there would be no virus driving an active immune response seven or 11 months after infection,” (Dr.) Ellebedy said. “These cells are not dividing. They are quiescent, just sitting in the bone marrow and secreting antibodies. They have been doing that ever since the infection resolved, and they will continue doing that indefinitely.”

“Ellebedy and colleagues now are studying whether vaccination also induces long-lived antibody-producing cells.”

—End Excerpts

The entire story can be read here.